DWI Arrest Procedures

To Blow or Not to Blow: Refusing DWI Tests in Texas

If a police officer pulls you over this holiday season under suspicion of DWI, what should you do?

Under Texas’s implied consent law, drivers who are lawfully arrested by an officer that has probable cause to believe the drivers are intoxicated are required to submit to chemical testing. The key words, however, are “lawfully arrested.”

Often prior to an arrest, police officers will ask drivers suspected of driving under the influence to submit to a series of tests. The most common tests are the Standardized Field Sobriety Test (SFST) and the portable breath test (PBT). What many drivers are not aware of is that you are not required to submit to an SFST or a PBT. Furthermore, there is no additional penalty refusing these tests for the DWI.

The SFST, which consists of three tests (the walk and turn, the one-leg stand and the horizontal gaze nystagmus) as well as the PBT have serious problems that make them unreliable indicators of inebriation. Grading the SFST is a subjective process and even people who are totally sober can fail. And the PBT is conducted with breathalyzer devices that are not always accurate. For these reasons, you should always refuse the SFST as well as the PBT.

Once you are lawfully arrested, refusal to submit to blood, breath or urine tests (chosen by the police) can result in administrative penalties including the suspension of your driver’s license. However, refusing can also deny prosecutors evidence that could be used to push for higher penalties in court.

Should you refuse tests once you have been lawfully arrested? In some situations, refusal can be the better decision. For a first offense in Texas, refusal will result in a 180-day license suspension, whereas a first DWI will result in a 90-day suspension. But refusal will not necessarily prevent a conviction, and often your refusal will be used against you as evidence that you were, in fact, impaired.

As with any situation involving a DWI arrest, your best course of action is to immediately get in contact with a criminal defense attorney.

Mike Goolsby

A veteran in both civil court cases and criminal defense, Mike Goolsby is a respected lawyer with more than 16 years of experience practicing law. He received his Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University of North Texas in 1990, followed by his J.D. from the prestigious Thomas M. Cooley Law School in 1994. After earning his law degree, Mr. Goolsby worked as an Assistant District Attorney for the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office. As a trial lawyer, he was able to gain exceptional access to the criminal court system in this major metropolitan area, giving him immeasurable, distinct experience that helped him build a solid foundation for his own private legal practice. Mr. Goolsby went on to practice civil law for Maverick Acceptance Group, a venture capital company. Here, he gained invaluable knowledge of the civil side of the law, adding to his already diverse portfolio of legal expertise. In 1999, he opened the doors of The Goolsby Law Firm and has been successfully serving the residents of North Texas ever since. As an attorney, Mr. Goolsby combines his experience in both the civil and criminal fields to offer unmatched legal representation to his clients. With a long list of satisfied clients, Mr. Goolsby continues to build his practice through fair and aggressive legal defense.

Share
Published by
Mike Goolsby
Tags: DWI

Recent Posts

Resisting Arrest in Texas

In Texas, resisting arrest stands as a significant legal issue that can complicate any interaction…

7 months ago

The Role of Technology in Enhancing Administrative License Suspension Enforcement in Texas

Technological Advances in ALS Enforcement The Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) has incorporated several…

9 months ago

Cross

Case Conclusion Date: August 6, 2021 Practice Area: Criminal Defense Outcome: Assault Case Dismissed Description:…

3 years ago

Stewart

Case Conclusion Date: April 27, 2021 Practice Area: Criminal Defense Outcome: Burglary Case Dismissed Description:…

3 years ago

Vargas

Case Conclusion Date: August 23, 2021 Practice Area: Criminal Defense Outcome: Theft Case Dismissed Description:…

3 years ago

Brown

Case Conclusion Date: September 13, 2021 Practice Area: Criminal Defense Outcome: AFV Case Dismissed Description:…

3 years ago

This website uses cookies.