General Information

Are Police Required to Release Bodycam Footage?

Who should have access to footage filmed by police body cameras? Are the police allowed to withhold this footage?

Recently, Sen. Eddie Lucio Jr. (D-Brownsville) asked Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton if police were allowed to withhold certain footage, not only from the public, but from civilian supervisors. The question hinges on whether this footage would interfere with the detection, investigation or prosecution of a crime if viewed.

These civilian supervisors could include a city manager, a city council member or a civilian with police oversight.

Why Would Police Need to Withhold Footage?

Lucio asked if civilian supervisors have an inherent right to access of bodycam footage, and if so, are police allowed to say no to requests?

One concern, expressed by Charley Wilkison, head of the Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas, is the potential politicization of certain crimes.

State law dictates that any agency that uses bodycams must create guidelines that explain when and how the public can access the footage. The requester must know the approximate time and exact place that a recording was made and must know the name of at least one person in the recording.

However, the Texas Public Information Act stipulates that if a video’s release could interfere with an investigation or a prosecution, that information can be withheld. And these investigations can take weeks, or months or even years, delaying the release of the video. These restrictions become even more restrictive when the footage shows events leading to either an investigation of an officer’s conduct or shows deadly force by a peace officer.

On the other hand, if the police believe that making a bodycam video public will further some law enforcement purpose, they may do so.

How will Paxton respond? We will know within six months, based on typical timelines for responses from the Attorney General’s office.

Mike Goolsby

A veteran in both civil court cases and criminal defense, Mike Goolsby is a respected lawyer with more than 16 years of experience practicing law. He received his Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University of North Texas in 1990, followed by his J.D. from the prestigious Thomas M. Cooley Law School in 1994. After earning his law degree, Mr. Goolsby worked as an Assistant District Attorney for the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office. As a trial lawyer, he was able to gain exceptional access to the criminal court system in this major metropolitan area, giving him immeasurable, distinct experience that helped him build a solid foundation for his own private legal practice. Mr. Goolsby went on to practice civil law for Maverick Acceptance Group, a venture capital company. Here, he gained invaluable knowledge of the civil side of the law, adding to his already diverse portfolio of legal expertise. In 1999, he opened the doors of The Goolsby Law Firm and has been successfully serving the residents of North Texas ever since. As an attorney, Mr. Goolsby combines his experience in both the civil and criminal fields to offer unmatched legal representation to his clients. With a long list of satisfied clients, Mr. Goolsby continues to build his practice through fair and aggressive legal defense.

Share
Published by
Mike Goolsby

Recent Posts

Resisting Arrest in Texas

In Texas, resisting arrest stands as a significant legal issue that can complicate any interaction…

8 months ago

The Role of Technology in Enhancing Administrative License Suspension Enforcement in Texas

Technological Advances in ALS Enforcement The Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) has incorporated several…

10 months ago

Cross

Case Conclusion Date: August 6, 2021 Practice Area: Criminal Defense Outcome: Assault Case Dismissed Description:…

3 years ago

Stewart

Case Conclusion Date: April 27, 2021 Practice Area: Criminal Defense Outcome: Burglary Case Dismissed Description:…

3 years ago

Vargas

Case Conclusion Date: August 23, 2021 Practice Area: Criminal Defense Outcome: Theft Case Dismissed Description:…

3 years ago

Brown

Case Conclusion Date: September 13, 2021 Practice Area: Criminal Defense Outcome: AFV Case Dismissed Description:…

3 years ago

This website uses cookies.