The camera showed three officers, once of whom walked up to the protester and illegally seized his camera, claiming it was illegal for the protester to take his picture (not true). What he didn’t know was that the camera was on video mode and was actively recording everything. So, when the officer walked back and set the camera on top of the car, he had no idea it was still recording while the three officers began fabricating criminal charges to hit the protesters with.
“You want to punch a number on this either way?” (This is police slang for opening up an investigation involving a case number)
“Gotta cover our ass.”
“We could hit him with reckless use of the highway by a pedestrian and creating a public disturbance.” “And then we claim in backup we had multiple people who stopped to complain. They didn’t want to stay and offer a statement, so we took our own course of action.”
Now, the protester and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit saying the three police officers retaliated against the protester, violated his First Amendment right to protest and his Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure.
Police have a responsibility to uphold the law, but are not allowed to create random reasons to punish law-abiding citizens just because the police don’t like what they are doing (or in this case, protesting). If you have been charged with a crime and you believe police fabricated the charges for the sake of charging you, you’re going to want a successful Dallas criminal defense attorney on your side to help you through this.
The Goolsby Law Firm is a Texas criminal defense law firm with offices in the Dallas, Plano, Arlington, Fort Worth and Denton areas. We offer free consultations.
In Texas, resisting arrest stands as a significant legal issue that can complicate any interaction…
Technological Advances in ALS Enforcement The Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) has incorporated several…
Case Conclusion Date: August 6, 2021 Practice Area: Criminal Defense Outcome: Assault Case Dismissed Description:…
Case Conclusion Date: April 27, 2021 Practice Area: Criminal Defense Outcome: Burglary Case Dismissed Description:…
Case Conclusion Date: August 23, 2021 Practice Area: Criminal Defense Outcome: Theft Case Dismissed Description:…
Case Conclusion Date: September 13, 2021 Practice Area: Criminal Defense Outcome: AFV Case Dismissed Description:…
This website uses cookies.